🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I traditionally steered clear of heavy use of randomization during my D&D games. I preferred was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice rather than pure luck. However, I opted to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A popular actual-play show utilizes a DM who often asks for "luck rolls" from the players. The process entails picking a type of die and outlining possible results tied to the result. It's essentially no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these are created spontaneously when a player's action has no predetermined conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own table, primarily because it looked engaging and provided a break from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing dynamic between preparation and improvisation in a roleplaying game.

A Powerful Session Moment

During one session, my party had just emerged from a large-scale fight. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. Rather than deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a profoundly poignant sequence where the adventurers came upon the remains of their allies, still clasped together in their final moments. The cleric held last rites, which was especially significant due to prior roleplaying. As a final gesture, I improvised that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, showing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the party lacked to resolve another pressing story problem. You simply plan this type of magical moments.

Honing DM Agility

This incident led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are in fact the beating heart of D&D. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Players often take delight in ignoring the most detailed plans. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to think quickly and create scenarios in the moment.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for minor decisions that won't drastically alter the overarching story. As an example, I would avoid using it to establish if the main villain is a traitor. But, I might use it to decide whether the party arrive moments before a major incident occurs.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

This technique also works to maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the story is alive, shaping based on their decisions in real-time. It prevents the feeling that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the collaborative aspect of the game.

This philosophy has long been integral to the game's DNA. Early editions were filled with charts, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Even though current D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the required method.

Finding the Sweet Spot

Absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, equally valid no problem with stepping back and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Authority is a big factor in a DM's job. We require it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of suggestion is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little chance for minor outcomes. The result could discover that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have pre-written by yourself.